How reliable are our current techniques for processing spinal cord fMRI data? In a recently published paper, Dr. Mark Hoggarth and Max Wang explore how person-to-person variability in the contouring of fMRI spinal cord masks affects downstream analyses. Using masks drawn by 8 raters of varying experience to inform co-registration to standard template space, they identify spatial differences in the accuracy of registration related to underlying image contrast and rater experience. At the group-level, spatial differences were present in activation maps although no systematic effect on overall activation level was identified. This work characterizes how variability in manually contoured masks propagates to results in spinal cord fMRI, demonstrating that standardization of processing pipelines and improving image acquisition should be prioritized.
This work was performed in collaboration with Dr. Kenneth Weber at the Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab.
You can find the full access paper here!